Skip to Content
Course content

Soft Is Strong: The Leyden Way

Soft Is Strong: The Leyden Way

The method behind everything you will be taught here, where it comes from, and why the softest handler in the barn is almost always the one the horses choose.

Soft is strong. Clarity is kindness.

The Leyden Way is three things held together: Back to Nature, the Scientific Method, and First Principles. Take any one away and the other two go wrong.

Back to Nature means we start from what the horse actually is. A horse is a prey animal, built to detect movement, live in a herd with a clear social order, and run first and think second. It is not a large dog, it is not a machine, and it is not being difficult on purpose. Almost every so-called behaviour problem is a horse doing exactly what its nature says to do in the situation a human put it in.

The Scientific Method means we test rather than believe. If a technique is supposed to work, it should produce a measurable change in the horse's behaviour, repeatably, with a different handler, on a different day. We say what we expect, we try it, we watch what actually happens, and if the horse says no we change the method rather than blaming the horse. Tradition is a hypothesis, not evidence.

First Principles means when something is not working we do not reach for a bigger bit or a harsher aid. We break the problem down to the smallest true parts and rebuild. Two phrases will follow you through this whole program: reduce the ask, and feet first. If the horse cannot do it, ask for less until it can. If the mind is stuck, move the feet and the mind usually follows.

  • The Horse Comes First. When your goals and the horse's welfare conflict, the horse wins. Every time.
  • The horse is a mirror. A tight, hurried, frustrated handler produces a tight, hurried, frustrated horse.
  • The Leyden Standard. Leave every person and every horse calmer, safer, and more willing than you found them. In that order.

Soft Is Strong: The Leyden Way

Nothing in this method is original to us and we are careful to say so. The Leyden Way sits inside a clearly traceable lineage of North American horsemanship, and we credit it explicitly.

Tom Dorrance is the root. He was the one who turned the question around. Instead of asking how do I make the horse do this, he asked what is the horse trying to tell me, and what is my part in the trouble. He talked about feel, timing, and balance as the whole of horsemanship, and about working with the horse's mind rather than its body.

Ray Hunt took Dorrance's ideas out of the private conversation and into public clinics, and gave them their sharpest language. "Make the wrong thing difficult and the right thing easy." He insisted the horse be given the chance to find the answer rather than be held in position until it complied.

Buck Brannaman carried it into the modern era and made it teachable at scale. His great contribution for a beginner is precision: exactly where the hand goes, exactly when the release happens, exactly what a phase looks like. He is also blunt about the thing most people avoid, which is that the horse is a mirror and the problem is usually the human.

We are not claiming to speak for any of these horsemen. We are telling you where to go next when you want to go deeper.

People hear "soft" and picture a handler who lets the horse do whatever it likes. That is not softness, that is negligence, and horses find it deeply unsettling. A horse that cannot find a boundary will keep pushing until it does, and it will get bigger about asking.

Softness means starting every request at the smallest effective amount and being willing, immediately, to go up if there is no answer. The soft handler and the harsh handler may both end up putting real pressure on a given horse on a given day. The difference is that the soft handler started small, gave the horse an honest chance to answer the whisper, and got off the pressure the instant the try appeared.

Strength here means consistency and follow-through, not force. It is strong to hold a boundary calmly for the ninth time in a row. It is weak to lose your temper on the third. A horse can carry six hundred pounds of rider and tack, so you were never going to win a strength contest anyway. You win on clarity.

The practical test: after the session, is the horse easier to catch tomorrow? If it walks up to you, you were strong. If it drifts to the far fence, you were merely forceful.

The kindest thing you can be to a horse is predictable. Vagueness is not gentle, it is confusing, and confusion in a prey animal shows up as tension, then as evasion, then eventually as an explosion that people call "out of nowhere."

Clarity has three practical components. First, one meaning per cue. If a squeeze of both legs means go forward, it never also means stand still. Second, the same cue every time, from the same place on the body, with the same build. Third, an unmistakable release. The horse learns from the moment pressure stops, so a mushy, gradual release teaches a mushy, gradual answer.

Being clear will sometimes feel harsher than being vague, especially to a beginner who wants the horse to like them. It is the opposite. Horses relax around handlers whose rules do not move. They stay braced around handlers they cannot predict.

When a horse will not do something, resist the urge to add. Subtract instead. Work down this list in order.

  1. Is it pain? Check the obvious physical causes first. Saddle fit, a sore back, teeth, feet, a girth sore. A horse in pain cannot be trained out of it and should not be.
  2. Is it fear? A frightened horse has stopped learning. Get it back under threshold, further away from the scary thing, before asking again.
  3. Is it confusion? Have you actually taught this, or are you assuming? Ask for a smaller piece of it. Reduce the ask until you get a yes, then build back up.
  4. Is it stuck feet? If the mind has locked up, move the feet. Any direction. A horse that is moving is a horse that is thinking again.
  5. Only then, is it a boundary problem? If the horse understands, is not sore, and is not afraid, then be clear and follow through.

Ninety percent of what beginners call disobedience is one of the first four.

Theory is cheap. Here is the method in ordinary form.

You come to the barn after a bad day at work. You notice you are hurried, so before you get the halter you stand at the gate for sixty seconds and let your breathing slow down, because the horse is a mirror and you have nothing to gain from bringing that in with you.

The horse turns its hindquarters to you in the paddock. You do not march at its head. You change your angle, take the pressure off, and wait for the ear to swing toward you. When it does, you stop and let it come. That is the draw, and it is worth ninety seconds of your time.

You groom, and you find heat in the right front. You do not ride. You tell staff, write it in the book, and go do groundwork in the arena instead. That is The Horse Comes First, and it costs you the lesson you wanted.

You finish, put the horse away calmer than you found it, sweep the aisle, and hang the halter properly. Nobody saw you do it. That is the Leyden Standard.

What "mastered" looks like

You can explain the three parts of the Leyden Way in your own words and give an example of each from your own barn time. Under mild frustration, an observer sees you get slower and quieter rather than louder. When a horse says no, your first move is to check for pain, fear, or confusion, out loud, before you ask again with more.

Take this to your next lesson

  • Ask your instructor to point out one moment in your session where you were vague rather than clear.
  • Pick one cue and commit to using exactly the same build-up every single time for a month.
  • Before your next session, stand still at the gate for sixty seconds before you pick up a halter.
  • Watch a more experienced handler and count how small their first ask is.
  • Ask which of Dorrance, Hunt, or Brannaman your instructor would have you read or watch first.

The principle underneath

The Dorrance lineage gets described as a philosophy, which undersells it. What Tom Dorrance actually insisted on was a functional analysis: what did the horse do, what came immediately before it, what came immediately after. That is first principles applied to behaviour, decades before the language for it was in common use. Softness is the observable result of getting that analysis right. It is not a temperament you decide to adopt.

Next up

Feel, Timing, and Balance

Three words every horseman uses and almost nobody defines. Defined here, including the half second that separates a release from a reward.

Continue
Back to nature, the scientific method, and first principles. Where the Leyden Way came from, and why softness is a form of strength rather than the absence of it.
Rating
0 0

There are no comments for now.

to be the first to leave a comment.